34/They either assume a) someone else knows the why the dapp is valuable or b) someone else thinks someone else knows why it’s valuable
-
-
Replying to @adamludwin
35/Bottom line, a cryptocurrency has ZERO fundamental value if the dapp has no value to a human
3 replies 32 retweets 82 likes -
Replying to @adamludwin
36/Show me a dapp that people NEED (or believes they will soon need) and I will show you the price of that cryptocurrency going up over time
3 replies 15 retweets 58 likes -
Replying to @adamludwin
37/Show me a dapp that NO ONE RELLY NEEDS and together we can watch as the value of its cryptocurrency goes to zero
27 replies 11 retweets 69 likes -
Replying to @adamludwin
Giyom Lebleu Retweeted Giyom Lebleu
Good thread. Just want to argue a bit about censorship resistancehttps://twitter.com/giyom/status/888251611272798208 …
Giyom Lebleu added,
2 replies 2 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @giyom
Yo Giyom!
I like your points.
I actually WANT you to be right.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @adamludwin @giyom
But I can't think of one example of transactions "that otherwise would not have happened" outside of the intermediary stopping it. Can you?
6 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @adamludwin
I am arguing mostly about the use of "censorship".
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @adamludwin
I like
@NickSzabo4 "trust minimization" a bit better.2 replies 0 retweets 20 likes
Nick Szabo 🔑 Retweeted Nick Szabo 🔑
& its cousin worry minimization, incldng big UI problems like having to fill out tedious & insecure identity forms:https://twitter.com/NickSzabo4/status/888477025551269889 …
Nick Szabo 🔑 added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.