If a court has jurisdiction over the parties—at least in the US—a court will exercise authority and analyze the “deal.” /1
-
-
Replying to @awrigh01 @tradingbandit
What if the parties are individuals or small businesses in Guatemala dealing with same in Canada? Or in Albania with same in Zimbabwe?
1 reply 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @tradingbandit
It becomes a jurisdiction question and a question of whether a party can enforce a judgement.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
For example, if there is a mistake in the agreement, the Canadian party could attempt to hail the Guatemalan party into Canadian court.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
If the Canadian court has jurisdiction, it could render a judgment (including a default judgment), which Canadian party could try to enforce
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
For individuals/small parties, rules defined in a smart contract—& ability to automate performance obligations—help parties transact.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
that doesn’t mean courts won’t attempt to exercise jurisdiction & construe a smart contract and/or remedy a harm if they have jurisdiction
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @awrigh01 @NickSzabo4
Our blog post points out that coders will have to be trained as lawyers and vice versa, before this can happen.
5 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @tradingbandit @awrigh01
Lawyers & programmers can greatly benefit from learning each others' art. Doesn't necessarily require formal training.
13 replies 18 retweets 60 likes -
[3] Reputation might be useful. But often very can be gamed. Very local and private "law systems" like arbitration might be useful.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Indeed these are very useful for "wet" performance verification but limited in their social scalability.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.