People are free to run whatever software they want. But if you run software that is out-of-consensus with the economy it's your problem.
-
I think risk of losing billions of dollars trumps some vague statement with signatures on it.
They don't understand that they are at risk of losing billions of dollars of their & their customers' money. Core has not communicated this.
-
-
It has been communicated many times - but some people just won't listen.
-
Perhaps a post on the
@bitcoincoreorg blog is warranted? -
More exchanges should allow customers to signal preferences (similar to mining pools) rather than just dictating policies.
-
many exchanges have made their policies clear. up to customers to vote with their wallets and go where their bitcoins are treated well.
-
Really? Seems like most exchanges conceal such details rather than encourage less technical and non-technical to learn about them but...
-
then represent themselves as having more authority as large "economic" nodes.
-
*less technical and non-technical users
-
There are also many historical examples of exchanges/wallets being on the wrong side of technical issues that should be better publicized.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
They probably learned this from BU, but expect Core will cave in and provide them with safe software in the end. If it were that easy.
-
If
#Bitcoin cannot survive these sorts of attacks it has no hope surviving far more powerful adversaries it will later face.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
where are you on
#UASF/BIP148 Nick?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.