Who needs security when we can have fast, unsecure transactions? Don't mind that my 
could b deleted at any moment while buying my coffee.
As the security of a cryptocurrency improves, so does its value. Here's why. https://unenumerated.blogspot.rs/2017/02/money-blockchains-and-social-scalability.html … (LTC price vs. SegWit adoption)pic.twitter.com/kJwyhbhdK7
-
-
-
It's only a coffee. People who just want to buy coffees don't even care much about their own, much less other peoples' security.
-
Caramel macchiato must of been that good.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Surprised to see such hasty conclusions from you. SegWit on LTC is a pump; SegWit is LTC's only relevance. Obvious relationship.
-
LTC users are so excited because they want to become the "testbed for Bitcoin", finally establish coin as anything but BTC source copy-paste
-
Are we going to point to the crash in six months or less and say that was SegWit's fault also?
-
(Also worth noting that even if SegWit did increase security of LTC, dubious, it hasn't activated so should see no chg by your hyptohesis)
-
Correct. Markets move in lock-step with real life events. Anticipation of future events is unheard of. Why? Traders hate making profits, obv
-
The adoption of SegWit is a highly uncertain matter; the signalling information is the best that the vast majority of the money has.
-
I know, I was carrying Phil's sophistry to its logical conclusion for larks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.