You have my word we'll include this in our conversations as well
-
-
"Further"? What else do you object to
@NickSzabo4? You support decrease in block size? -
SegWit has many security & tps benefits but big security flaw by increasing bandwidth reqrmnts. 2MB trad is flaw++ w/o any security benefit.
-
Well the benefits are doubling TPS but you're right about security risks, we'll publish information on different scenarios to assess this
-
Here's a suggestion: get on IRC and talk with bitcoin developers and protocol people. Invite peer review on approach and proposals.
#wizards -
Perfect let's do that!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If that's the case, in the process of discussing a third option we can educate and arrive to a better solution
-
There is an option on the table. It's SegWit. Only question is how to get it activated. BIP 148 is promising.
-
ask why it's not being adopted and address those concerns. - it's bad science pushing changes using lobbyists and letters of intent
#bitcoin - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
As bitcoin has grown and continues to grow keeping it secure and decentralized with an ever growing 'ignorant' mob won't be easy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
isn't the ignorant mob by definition the group who lives with the highly censored forum ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The alternative to SegWit with 2MB is not your (excellent) proposal of SegWit, it is the current immobility. We need other options.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If miners leave core, u're sacrificing security.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.