![Giacomo Zucco [I identify as a -e^iπ vampire]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1172971162919415813/Pn8O2gkx_normal.jpg)
.@NickSzabo4 actually they do. the industry has matured in the past 20 years. see for instance the Clack paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00771
Smart contracts don't rely on courts to work. Try learning about metaphors some time Tim they crucial to understanding the world.
-
-
-
Barclays bank doesn't get to redefine the term "smart contract" by publishing a paper in a non-peer-reviewed journal
-
definitions can evolve over time, just like the term "blockchain" has. see the new
@digitalassetcom paper too. -
There already exist words to describe the things you want. Ricardian != smart contract. See: http://iang.org/papers/intersection_ricardian_smart.html …
-
Modify the SCs definition to follow the hype is unethical! See Szabo for definition and stop making confusion
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.