Identity is local, insecure, and labor-intensive. A good public blockchain is global, secure, and automated.
-
Be that as it may, you'll be upset if you can't tweet this stuff because https://twitter.com doesn't resolve properly.
Twitter is a major corporate brand, not a typical (non-celebrity) individual.
-
-
What's that you say? Sounds like:https://twitter.com/taoeffect/status/773677890961420289 …
-
And I'm neither a celebrity nor a corporate brand, but I prefer my blog resolving just fine thank you.
-
.
@NickSzabo4 Also, online identity can be made as secure as bitcoin, so if global identity is insecure, so is bitcoin. -
No, it can't. Not even close.
-
We must be talking about two very different "identities" if you think that.
-
I'm talking about how people normally use the term: human-readable ways to uniquely identity people.
-
Oh, so like a domain name? Then we're talking about the same thing, and Namecoin proved it can be as secure as Bitcoin.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.