@muneeb I believe you just made Muneeb's point?
UX of security is fighting an uphill battle. Your users won't put up with a hostile experience. Your attackers will.https://twitter.com/muneeb/status/766714385221976068 …
-
-
-
Security must be usable for it to exist in the first place.
-
Even basement hackers become insecure when their mom upstairs ends up getting compromised.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
yep, that's why memorable identifiers securely, provably linked to immutable records of ownership are a great solution /
@muneebThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Have you read http://sid.toolness.org/ch13yee.pdf ? In particular, last paragraph on page 2.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@muneeb This is why I like OpenDimes model https://medium.com/@beautyon_/exquisite-opendime-ad1195a2790e#.iborbiqf6 … nothing to learn, marrying security with the physical token.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@muneeb the problem is you have to login on multiple occasions, attacker only onceThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@muneeb if you follow the logic that not everyone will want to protect themselves you will eventually arrive at the need for govThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.