This paper seems to totally miss that economic growth changed qualitatively (i.e. innovation-led) during the IR.https://twitter.com/RePEc_NEP_HIS/status/674707908471353344 …
-
-
Replying to @antonhowes
@antonhowes Conveniently starts data at end of decline of W. Roman Empire: GDP/cap higher during those earlier centuries violates his model.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@antonhowes Fits your theory if innovation ideology increased increased monotonically from 500 AD nadir rather than being purely modern.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@antonhowes +/- a couple centuries for the nadir that's probably a good fit to literacy rates in W. Europe.
2:54 PM - 9 Dec 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.