Coal: not a sufficient reason for industrial revolution: http://antonhowes.tumblr.com/post/102001277904/national-king-coal … Perhaps not even necessary: http://burycoal.com/blog/2010/02/26/the-history-of-wood-and-coal-in-industrial-transport/ …
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4 Do you know why they preferred to use the wood as is rather than converting it into charcoal?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@mmeijeri When burning for indirect process heat or to power steam engine, purity not important enough to outweigh costs of making charcoal.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4 Is there any energy density difference?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.