@gwern @cinnamon_carter It's not a niche if no organism has chemical ability to exploit it.
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@gwern@cinnamon_carter Niches that required photosynthesis, nitrogen fixing, and even many far simpler capabilities were unavailable.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@cinnamon_carter Nevertheless, early Earth would have a great variety of organic chemicals to harvest. That is a big opportunity1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gwern
@gwern@cinnamon_carter What kinds of organics? What 150 base pair ecosystem could exploit them? Be specific stop hand-waving.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@cinnamon_carter It would use the amino acids and nuclear acids floating around, you know that. The usual abiogenesis proposals.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gwern
@gwern@cinnamon_carter A 150 base pair ecosystem can't catch, much less put to use, most of the amino & nuclear acids floating around.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@cinnamon_carter Why does it need to catch to grow or spread or evolve w/o competition? Does not catching prove panspermia?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gwern
@gwern@cinnamon_carter Many far more likely places in universe to find stable amino+nucleic acid soup than bombardment-era Earth.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@cinnamon_carter Be that as it may, what does that have to do with linearity of genomes as clocks and that paper's model?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gwern
@gwern@cinnamon_carter Linearity is just a good initial way to avoid "and now a miracle occurred" assumptions that plague these debates.5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@gwern @cinnamon_carter It's an early theory with much room for improvement, many niches open to grow into. Don't kill it off. :-)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.