Transaction fee market without block size limit would lead to too low a level of security for Bitcoin: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2400519 …
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@adam3us the relay network@TheBlueMatt and its effects havnt been studied2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jony_levin
@jony_levin@adam3us@TheBlueMatt If it hasn't been studied then why has it been deployed?3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@jony_levin@adam3us@TheBlueMatt FWIW, Coinscope paper by@socrates1024 is interesting (see part related to influential nodes)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LaurentMT
@LaurentMT@jony_levin@adam3us@TheBlueMatt@socrates1024 Link to Coinscope paper?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@jony_levin@adam3us@TheBlueMatt@socrates1024 https://cs.umd.edu/projects/coinscope/coinscope.pdf …1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @LaurentMT
@LaurentMT@NickSzabo4@jony_levin@adam3us@socrates1024 Indeed, the RN gives small miners access to those nodes without a ton of effort!2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TheBlueMatt
@TheBlueMatt@NickSzabo4@jony_levin@adam3us To be fair, It's not stated by@socrates1024 that I.N. are caused by the R.N. or others...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LaurentMT
@TheBlueMatt@NickSzabo4@jony_levin@socrates1024 Anyway, I agree with@adam3us that we can't prevent fast connections between econ. actors2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LaurentMT
@TheBlueMatt@NickSzabo4@jony_levin@socrates1024@adam3us What worries me is that higher blocksize limit may break your assumptions for RN2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@LaurentMT @TheBlueMatt @jony_levin @socrates1024 @adam3us RN doesn't need a big block size to break it, just a server hack or bad admin.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.