Transaction fee market without block size limit would lead to too low a level of security for Bitcoin: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2400519 …
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@adam3us the relay network@TheBlueMatt and its effects havnt been studied2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jony_levin
@jony_levin@adam3us@TheBlueMatt If it hasn't been studied then why has it been deployed?3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
.
@NickSzabo4@jony_levin@TheBlueMatt relay net reduces block transfer time by reference to already received tx, avoids sending tx twice.3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @adam3us
@adam3us@jony_levin@TheBlueMatt The problem must be awfully bad for an extremely bottlenecked TTP network to be the best solution.4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@adam3us@jony_levin hmm? Actually a hub and spoke network with optimized routing around the globe is damn near optional2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheBlueMatt
@NickSzabo4@adam3us@jony_levin otherwise each miner has to invest a lot to find that the way to route from china to eu s through Siberia1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheBlueMatt
@TheBlueMatt@adam3us@jony_levin So you centralize Bitcoin communications to save miners who buy $100m's of equipment a few thousand?1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@adam3us@jony_levin No, you add a centralization component (sucks) to make sure that people other than large pools can mine4 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
@TheBlueMatt @adam3us @jony_levin Whole point of decentralization (i.e. security) undermined if TTP can discriminate between miners.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.