A much more reasonable block size proposal, following historical growth rates in a "limiting nutrient" resource:https://gist.github.com/sipa/c65665fc360ca7a176a6 …
-
@NickSzabo4 Really? 2mb in 2 decades? under what justification? Everyone accepts bandwidth growth 30%, 1mb x 6 years x 30% is around 6.5mb
@Aquentys No: per Liebig's principle relevant costs are for bandwidth bottlenecks & DRAM costs, not avg. bandwidth.
-
-
@NickSzabo4 There has been a huge debate so far, you can't just tweet blocksize should be 2mb in 2 decades. Maybe expand in full blog post?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.