.@zooko @morcosa "Putting some thought behind new mechanisms for understanding and managing forks is more important" -@JeremyRubin
-
-
Replying to @adam3us
.
@zooko@morcosa@JeremyRubin its all true but gives no indication there could be severe security consequences with a contentious hard-fork.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @adam3us
@adam3us I'm trying to think less about prevention than about handling it when prevention fails.@morcosa@JeremyRubin2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @twobitidiot
.
@twobitidiot@zooko We don't know because not much informed discussion has taken place. My suggestion is to increase within safety margins.1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @adam3us
@adam3us@twobitidiot@zooko Needs more computer science, less noise.11 replies 38 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@el33th4xor@adam3us@twobitidiot@zooko Nick, Adam is right and I dare say it needs less CS and more econ, psych, sociology etc1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Daniel_Plante
@Daniel_Plante@NickSzabo4@adam3us@twobitidiot@zooko Those disciplines deliver, at best, game theoretic results, weaker than CS techniqs.2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @el33th4xor
@el33th4xor@Daniel_Plante@adam3us@twobitidiot Game theory, econ are subjective (vs. CSci objective) + too optimistic in security context.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
@el33th4xor @Daniel_Plante @adam3us @twobitidiot Game theory incomplete: http://unenumerated.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/small-game-fallacies.html … + players in security worse than rational.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.