.@robinhanson Maybe they don't offer compromises because they know they don't even rule their *own* faction. (1/2)
-
-
Replying to @bryan_caplan
.
@robinhanson Example: I can't strike a deal on libertarianism's behalf, or even GMU econ's behalf. (2/2)1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @bryan_caplan
@bryan_caplan Even so, seeking better compromise is better way to influence big outcomes than planning what you'd do if you ruled the world.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @robinhanson
.
@robinhanson Both inferior to persuading moderates to marginally revise their ideal points in your direction, no?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @bryan_caplan
@bryan_caplan To win moderates, you want to see things from their point of view, and not just declare what you'd do if king. I.e.,compromise1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @robinhanson
.
@robinhanson Presenting evidence and arguments persuasive to people who disagree with you != compromise.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @bryan_caplan
@bryan_caplan Figuring out what would give other people what they want *is* compromise, compared to figuring out what you'd want.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @robinhanson
@robinhanson@bryan_caplan Compromise is a negative Overton window.2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@bryan_caplan You are saying that compromise isn't politically feasible?!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robinhanson
@robinhanson@bryan_caplan No, I'm saying unless you're directly negotiating actual legal code, it's generally a bad political strategy.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
@robinhanson @bryan_caplan I'm assuming one cares about the actual political outcome -- compromise often great for just signalling you care.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.