@slatestarcodex That's a bridge too far for a while, and even when possible it could only be true for a few.
-
@NickSzabo4@bryan_caplan You are saying that compromise isn't politically feasible?!
@robinhanson @bryan_caplan No, I'm saying unless you're directly negotiating actual legal code, it's generally a bad political strategy.
-
-
@NickSzabo4@bryan_caplan No one but a few leaders should think about compromise? Everyone else should only discuss desires? Implausible. -
@robinhanson@bryan_caplan Thankfully most laws aren't drafted by "a few leaders". Instead thousands (mostly professionals i.e. lawyers). -
@NickSzabo4@bryan_caplan And the few who draft exact law words are the only people who should think about useful compromises? -
@robinhanson@bryan_caplan They're generally the only people who can advance actual political goals by doing so. -
@robinhanson@bryan_caplan n.b. I'm not counting politician taking centrist position to win election as "compromise".
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@robinhanson@bryan_caplan I'm assuming one cares about the actual political outcome -- compromise often great for just signalling you care.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.