Russia: $2T GDP, $ XXXB M1, nukes, yet ruble has 40%+ volatiliy in < 30 days. Puts BTC ( <$1B GDP, $5B M1, no nukes) volatility in context
-
-
Replying to @polemitis
@polemitis@NickSzabo4 I would say this proves that large market cap won't necessarily safeguard from volatility.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alexberegszaszi
@alexberegszaszi@polemitis Currencies the use of which is spread among greater diversity of transactions are less volatile.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@alexberegszaszi all true, but my point is that it is way too early to worry about BTC volatility,still early days2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @polemitis
@polemitis@alexberegszaszi Catch-22: don't want to use because too volatile, grows slow, remains volatile4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
@NickSzabo4@alexberegszaszi slowly BTC will have to bootstrap up the more volume, now clarity, less volatility curve.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @polemitis
@polemitis@alexberegszaszi Key is diversity of use for pmt & store of value, not volume of FX.3 replies 3 retweets 3 likes
@polemitis @alexberegszaszi Ruble shows can have high FX volume but if economy dominated by 1 commodity can be v. volatile.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.