"Allies" meaning the U.S. has helped them on their territory at huge cost in blood & money, but they've never helped us outside of it. Not in WWII, not in Korea, not in Vietnam, nowhere else. Stop sacrificing American boys' blood for such "allies" you mentally diseased vampires.
-
It refutes the central point.
No. A trivial 130-man mercenary company paid for by the British Empire to fight inside Iraq pales in comparison to the anti-British, and thus at that time pro-Axis and anti-American, Kurdish revolt of 1943. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1943_Kurdish_revolt_in_Iraq …
-
-
The 130 man group referenced was in 1933 when the British distrusted the Kurds and wouldn’t let more serve. More served in WW2, but I can’t find a source on how many.
-
The Wikipedia article doesn’t mention any British or allied deaths and frames it purely as a fight for independence against the Iraqis. The soviets only enter the article at the very end as providing sanctuary. Hard to paint that as anti-allied imo, just based on your wiki link
-
"The Iraqis" at that time were the British Empire. I still don't know whether you are just an articulate moron or a pathological liar, but either way blocked.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.