"Allies" meaning the U.S. has helped them on their territory at huge cost in blood & money, but they've never helped us outside of it. Not in WWII, not in Korea, not in Vietnam, nowhere else. Stop sacrificing American boys' blood for such "allies" you mentally diseased vampires.
-
Don't disagree in principle, but for someone who understands the coming world of decentralization, it's bizarre that you think we should disengage instead of engaging with the world
It's bizarre that I don't think choosing sides and killing people, ours and theirs, among distant cultures we are preposterously ignorant about is a good use of large centralized armed forces?
-
-
Right but our disengagement has an immediate impact which we're already seeing. Do you think isolationism will work in the 21st century in a far more globalized world than even today??
-
PS it's not like we were pulling out of active conflict it's semi active at best
-
We can engage from afar without having troops there. Having troops there doesn’t mean we are “engaged”
-
Again agree in principle but not in this specific situation
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.