Throwing money at stocks hoping they can beat the inflation rate devaluing cash balances is not investing, but the complete opposite. Malinvestments are capital allocations which wouldn't occur on the free market, which is exactly what many stocks and RE "investments" are.
-
-
Replying to @_benkaufman @mrcoolbp
It may not be investing by definition, but isn’t owning stocks the best strategy to beat inflation? I am referring to the non-bitcoin part of a diversified portfolio. Property can also work but I prefer liquidity. Thoughts?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
No. Inflation was rampant in the 1970s while the U.S. stock market was flat in nominal terms. In real terms it lost about 90% of its value.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Right. Weren’t CDs and such paying very high interest rates? I remember my dad, who was horrible at money so take with a grain of salt, enjoying 12-13% CD returns for years. So not stocks in that environment, but today it seems reasonable. Anything better?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Sure, but you couldn't predict whether a CD would finish ahead or behind the CPI. Usually ahead, but sometimes not. Gold was the best investment of the 1970s.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @ddelruss and
Commodities in general did well in the 1970s. (Of course, the very investments that shined in the 1970s were awful in the 1980s and 90s, and vice versa. YMMV).
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @ddelruss and
Mr. Szabo, What is an asset allocation/portfolio mix that makes sense to you over the long run? What’s your analog for something like Ray Dalio’s all weather portfolio? Would be great to know.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
It varies widely depending on a person's financial situation: what they are saving the money for, risk tolerance, etc.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.