And indeed governance minimization, via substituting security protocol for governance wherever possible, is why Bitcoin's market cap dwarfs that of any altcoin, and especially dwarfs the "governance-uber-alles" shitcoins.
-
-
The is implication of the term "ruthless minimization" taken to the extreme leads to control by a single person/entity or tiny group of individuals. That's what it says to me anyway.
-
That's quite an imagination you have. No, it's about what beliefs among the decentralized devs and node operators will produce the most trust-minimized outcomes. When these decentralized decision-makers believe in ruthlessly minimizing the number of decisions they need to make.
-
Your definition provides some clarity behind what you were thinking. Taken by itself it is not a stretch to imagine "ruthless minimization" leading to centralized control of something.
-
It seems a stretch to me, but thank you for the opportunity to clarify.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Isn't this thread an example?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.