yet, the EOS experiment removed its governance and reduced its market cap. So, no, no causality seen here, move on please.
-
-
Replying to @iang_fc @NickSzabo4 and
The optimal strategy probably looks something like this. https://vitalik.ca/general/2018/08/26/layer_1.html … There's definitely a happy medium (in the abyss) between governance-uber-alles and completely ignoring research breakthroughs in security/scaling optimisations.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @C1aranMurray @iang_fc and
Most of the practical, secure and dependable scaling applied research is actually happenig in Bitcoin, or blue sky cryptography research, unrelated to alts
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Such as? (and how can it be implemented if you've outright rejected governance as you say above)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @C1aranMurray @iang_fc and
oh ic you mean change. maybe this is a good place to start about change process for FOSS, IETF and Bitcoin "The Tao of Bitcoin Development" https://medium.com/@bergealex4/the-tao-of-bitcoin-development-ff093c6155cd … no governance does not mean no change. governance in crypto lingo means human discretion over economic policy.
3 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @adam3us @C1aranMurray and
no governance does not mean not fixing a bug, not implementing win-win improvements, in a backwards compatible way that does not impinge on anyone's ownership, functionality, nor supply etc.
@bergealex4 see also this talk on the topic by@LukeDashjrhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8Onzq46YZg …2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @adam3us @C1aranMurray and
"Governance" is the process of how rules are made, changed and implemented. Since these things occur in the bitcoin protocol, it has governance. Applying very narrow definitions outside the norms hampers meaningful discourse.
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Douglas_Horn @adam3us and
Nick Szabo 🔑 Retweeted Nick Szabo 🔑
Rather than literally zero governance Adam perhaps means that Bitcoin governance is something like choice (3) below.https://twitter.com/NickSzabo4/status/1009996445280169985 …
Nick Szabo 🔑 added,
5 replies 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @Douglas_Horn and
Which is where anyone that properly understands blockchains (IMO) wants to get to. In the meantime we’ll have to crack some eggs to make an omelette so we’re not looking to smtng like Liquid to scale to global finance levels b/c as a wise man once said “TTPs are security...”
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @C1aranMurray @NickSzabo4 and
Defining a common language is one of the things that will help demystify crypto to the masses. We can't hold on to our own precious definitions contrary to common usage and expect mass adoption.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
"Governance" isn't particularly helpful in the language or communications department. It's such a broad and vague term, if one can possibly substitute a more specific word for it one should do so.
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @C1aranMurray and
I agree. We need a better common vocabulary. But we should examine whether our current one is fostering or hindering communication. I think this is a case of the latter.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.