Shallow safety vs. deep safety: Shallow: estimated from volatility, assumes nothing goes wrong at lower layers of the protocol stack Deep: what happens to your assets upon underlying failures? e.g. how would your digitally centralized assets fare against sanctions or cyberwar?
-
Show this thread
-
Digitally centralized assets have poor deep safety. They were designed in & only work in a legally stable environment. Real estate & gold have deeper safety, assuming strong local security. Trust-minimized Bitcoin uses computer science to achieve unprecedentedly deep safety.
17 replies 109 retweets 441 likesShow this thread -
Digital centralization has made it possible, for the first time in history, for authorities to routinely extract haircuts and "negative interest". Some countries in Europe have already used these techniques against digitally centralized cash balances.
4 replies 30 retweets 184 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Replying to @shbaneq
No. You are confusing government with God. It is extremely far from being either omniscient or omnipotent.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable
All things that would encourage more people to use secure instead of an insecure form of money.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.