hmm... i disagree with the claim that it would cost 585,000 BTC to reorg the whole chain in 325 days
-
-
Replying to @eiaine @nic__carter and
Do you think electricity market liquidity would increase that value much more than economies of scale in equipment would reduce it or what’s your rationale?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @fnietom @nic__carter and
- electricity/hashrate sold in fiat, and would need to secure the resources up front (it would be a huge loss to abandon the effort halfway) - impossible to predict hashrate/price a year in advance
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @eiaine @nic__carter and
I don’t see how those arguments can change that figure significantly. Even if it’s double what I stated it would falsify your security rule.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I haven't seen anything falsified here. What are you talking about?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @eiaine and
The cost of reorging the whole chain is lower than total value of the network. For a large enough payment you cannot rely on waiting for enough confirmations to accumulate PoW in order to make it economically irrational to revert. Security is not just PoW.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
That means Bitcoin doesn't secure such a large transaction. Something else may or may not secure it, but Bitcoin does not. What did you think it meant?
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @fnietom and
Yeah. Fair to say the best way, at present, to securely transfer billions of dollars instantly may be an open question.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @billsmith4lyfe @NickSzabo4 and
Value would be destroyed long before it could be extracted. MAD. Besides, at the rate mining is increasing, we just have to wait a while longer.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @midmagic @NickSzabo4 and
MAD is a pretty good analogy I think
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
As in, insane to be encouraging ultra-whales to rely on this kind of "security".
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @billsmith4lyfe and
Theft requires collusion of a sort that is outside the security guarantees; still, there is no functional difference between a thousand users owning interest in one transaction or a thousand transactions. And Bitcoin secures "billions" every day. So..
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.