Re-org depends on perspective no? Under "code is law" Bitcoin nodes are expected to follow the chain with the most work, even if the longer chain appears after a day. Anything else would be an active act of social governance.
-
I agree with the previous tweet but “bitcoin will fail if it has no intellectual diversity” isn’t very meaningful. Bitcoin doesn’t have intellect, it’s an asset class. Stakeholders will be diversified because.. why won’t they be? and the occasional block has nothing to do with it
In practice I think you're right that some form of community governance will happen in that situation if the situation is catastrophic and a large enough percentage of the community is affected.
Indeed, Bitcoin influencers should remain intellectually quite distinct from altcoiners & nocoiners, otherwise we are correlated rather than anti-correlated & competing for the same financial scraps instead of with the huge advantage of new fertile territory we have so far had.
![Filipe Neves [🔑₿]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1149243065674227712/2ZPwedwN_normal.jpg)
