Such confidence in Bitcoin is splendid, but a 94,500 BTC tx tempts fate. If recipient can make that much from reversing the tx, they can afford to run a 51% attack for more than 40 days. Big if & very visible, but security here depends more on trust & less on the protocol itself.https://twitter.com/whale_alert/status/1169815776733220866 …
-
-
The smarter move would be if he/her split that TX up, right?
-
It does seem extreme. When dealing with so much it seems that no amount of op sec and security overkill would be too much. Splitting into $50 mm increments over a few days & addresses seems basic. But
they have more sats than me so they must be doing something right. 
-
Very likely a tx internal to an organization. Relying on their key management & other internal controls, not on the difficulty of reversing Bitcoin tx. Hopefully they understand this, and hopefully others doing actual value-for-value exchanges don't think they can emulate them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
TC;DU (too complicated, didn’t understand)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anyone holding 94,500 BTC has a vested interest in maintaining their value. They are not likely to spend the considerable amounts of money and effort it takes to attack the network. They would also later need to remain anonymous laundering all these tainted coins. Not worth it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nick, stop moving your BTC
damn 0.0012% of that would be nice 
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.