"Smart contract" is a very useful concept & phrase. "Smart" as in "smart phone" (shorthand for computerized phone), "contract" meaning it does some important things we previously relied on contracts to do for our deals, especially controlling assets & incentivizing performance.https://twitter.com/timoncc/status/1051420695488552960 …
-
Show this thread
-
That said, if your dApp/persistent script doesn't control assets or, short of invoking traditional law, incentivize performance, it's not a smart contract and you should call it something else.
5 replies 31 retweets 104 likesShow this thread -
Worrying about whether a smart contract is "legally enforceable" reflects a profound misunderstanding. The main relation of smart Ks to traditional courts is that smart Ks control burden of lawsuit. If "possession is 90% of the law", then a good smart K may be "99% of the law".
15 replies 62 retweets 181 likesShow this thread -
Nick Szabo 🔑 Retweeted Nick Szabo 🔑
Nick Szabo 🔑 added,
1 reply 4 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
It's a common sense idea: if one person has control over something, then another person who wants to obtain control via traditional law has the burden of filing a lawsuit or of otherwise convincing legal authorities that said control should be changed.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.