Money is violent currency. Satoshis are an example of peaceful currency. 


-
-
Replying to @anthemhayek
Govt fiat money requires monopoly privilege to exist with such poor store of value characteristics (inflation). Arguably money emerges on a free market, not by force, so I don't consider govt fiat to be a true money. Only reason we have many different (bad) monies is force.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mrcoolbp
Money is a creation of governments/forced marketplaces. Hence money is violent. I prefer a future of ‘currencies’ accessing voluntary marketplaces referred to sometimes as public blockchain protocols.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anthemhayek
This is patently false. Money is an emergent phenomenon that existed long before govts. The paradigm of govt money has distorted our collective understanding of monetary phenomena. I recommend
@NickSzabo4 Shelling Out as a primer on monetary history: https://nakamotoinstitute.org/shelling-out/2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Menger is another good source
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mrcoolbp @NickSzabo4
I am patent-ly aware of Menger being trapped in forced marketplace constructs. Hence his disbelief in barter, which is literally what satoshis and the secondary marketplace for satoshis & other public protocol software access tokens represent—barter.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anthemhayek @mrcoolbp
So if you go mine some gold and stamp it into coins without the blessings of a government, the use of those coins is just barter?
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @mrcoolbp
No, that would be money. Coins can only be created by government mints. Patent-ly true.
3 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @anthemhayek @mrcoolbp
OK, so you are having a legal discussion, not a scientific or technological or institutional or economic discussion. Laws vary; I'll leave the legal research to the lawyers. P.S. perhaps consult your namesake Friedrich "The Denationalization of Money" Hayek on the subject.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @mrcoolbp
The reality is recorded [corrupted] history only includes forced marketplace constructs from the past ~6,000 years...in ~200,000 years of homosapien records. There only remain cuneiform tablets and similar in terms of barter records being dominant. Everything is cyclical.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
Coercion certainly has been and is very common in human affairs, and laws are generally enforced by force, but that does not mean that some actually simple things like money, functionally rather than legally defined, always have to depend on such. Best of wishes.
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @mrcoolbp
I appreciate & respect your viewpoints immeasurably. Just as the invention Bitcoin created the ‘impossible’ & a ‘miracle’ of historically incorruptible data for the 1st time in [corrupted] history, I think furthermore Bitcoin created a foundation for peaceful commercial layers.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.