As you've now fully reverted to your usual truculent self, I won't engage with you any longer. You make some good points in your book and in the debate. But you couldn't be more unversed in the requirements for civil discourse.
-
-
Replying to @GeorgeSelgin @saifedean and
Oh good grief not this again. Long-time HODLers tend to have much less dependence on bosses than your typical DC area pundit. We thus often exhibit an appalling lack of the standard organizational servility. This is often interpreted as conspicuous obnoxiousness. Deal with it.
1 reply 6 retweets 74 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @saifedean and
I'm sorry, Nick, but HODLers aren't exempted from the normal rules of civility, which are not, despite what they may think, peculiar to DC (quite the contrary!). And I deal with it by refusing to put up with it, as I would with any other persons.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @GeorgeSelgin @saifedean and
There's a pathological one-way version of these "rules" where authority figures in mass media and at DC "think" tanks get to ridicule the unwashed masses ("deplorables"), but the unwashed masses must be "civil" (i.e. servile). We don't play by those "rules". Deal with it.
4 replies 7 retweets 53 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @saifedean and
I don't expect everyone to be civil, Nick. I know better. I do expect civility from well-known experts, like yourself and Saifedean, who hardly qualify as part of the "unwashed masses." I also expect them not to encourage or apologize for incivility in others.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @GeorgeSelgin @saifedean and
Some of the most well-known "experts", better known and with much better pseudo-scientific credentials (e.g. "Nobel" prizes) than Saf or I, have treated Bitcoin people with great incivility. Who knows what these "rules" actually are since your own peers do not abide by them.
5 replies 4 retweets 54 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @saifedean and
Shame on them. But what does it mean to call them my "peers"? I'm a free agent. I don't belong to any school or movement. I am probably closer in many of my fundamental beliefs to Bitcoiners than I am to many of them.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @GeorgeSelgin @saifedean and
You are a professional economist, no? Fellow professionals are often called "peers". As for "free agent" -- you work at the DC area Cato Institute, yes or no? You have a boss there, yes or no? And a paycheck that depends on keeping that boss happy, yes or no?
1 reply 2 retweets 20 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @GeorgeSelgin and
People with bosses don’t like admitting that their actions are influenced by their boss, even if it’s only subconscious. I say this as a person with a boss, unfortunately.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Blackblastie @GeorgeSelgin and
It's very obvious that people with bosses are highly influenced and constrained by said bosses. Especially true for political or economic opinions of people working at political or economic think tanks. Yet the preposterous pretense that they are "free agents".
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes
Having spent three years in DC, I can also report that the "libertarian" think tanks there are strongly influenced by their neighbors who vote about 90% Democrat (or even further left). Go to the same parties etc. Donor money will promote much more liberty in Austin than in DC.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.