As you've now fully reverted to your usual truculent self, I won't engage with you any longer. You make some good points in your book and in the debate. But you couldn't be more unversed in the requirements for civil discourse.
-
-
Replying to @GeorgeSelgin @saifedean and
Oh good grief not this again. Long-time HODLers tend to have much less dependence on bosses than your typical DC area pundit. We thus often exhibit an appalling lack of the standard organizational servility. This is often interpreted as conspicuous obnoxiousness. Deal with it.
1 reply 6 retweets 74 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @saifedean and
I'm sorry, Nick, but HODLers aren't exempted from the normal rules of civility, which are not, despite what they may think, peculiar to DC (quite the contrary!). And I deal with it by refusing to put up with it, as I would with any other persons.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @GeorgeSelgin @saifedean and
There's a pathological one-way version of these "rules" where authority figures in mass media and at DC "think" tanks get to ridicule the unwashed masses ("deplorables"), but the unwashed masses must be "civil" (i.e. servile). We don't play by those "rules". Deal with it.
4 replies 7 retweets 53 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @saifedean and
I don't expect everyone to be civil, Nick. I know better. I do expect civility from well-known experts, like yourself and Saifedean, who hardly qualify as part of the "unwashed masses." I also expect them not to encourage or apologize for incivility in others.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @GeorgeSelgin @saifedean and
Some of the most well-known "experts", better known and with much better pseudo-scientific credentials (e.g. "Nobel" prizes) than Saf or I, have treated Bitcoin people with great incivility. Who knows what these "rules" actually are since your own peers do not abide by them.
5 replies 4 retweets 54 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @GeorgeSelgin and
I'm uncivil with Twitter trolls, but I've been nothing but respectful of Prof Selgin for more than a year of waiting for him to elaborate his criticisms of my book, to no avail. I'm not responsible for what others say to him but he's responsible for not providing his arguments!
4 replies 1 retweet 47 likes -
Replying to @saifedean @NickSzabo4 and
Gary North was one of the great anti-Bitcoin Austrians https://www.garynorth.com/public/11828.cfm …. I have a feeling that none of them want's to break ranks and risk taking Bitcoin seriously because it will hurt their reputations in the group. They're almost all Computer Illiterate; a big problem.
3 replies 1 retweet 20 likes -
Replying to @Beautyon_ @saifedean and
Ultimately, what these people say doesn't matter. Only people who contribute to the truth matter, and they're rewarded because telling the truth helps everyone. The Austrian rejection of Bitcoin is a historic error; everyone has learned enough from them.https://hackernoon.com/james-bellington-on-the-austrians-vs-bitcoin-debate-b095c3b31a8e …
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Beautyon_ @saifedean and
Discussions about tone are a way for people who can't make arguments about the software to gain an easy out. It is a common practice to do this, and it too doesn't matter because the software works whether anyone agrees with how it works or the tone of discussion about it.
2 replies 0 retweets 12 likes
It is, ironically, a very uncivil and toxic way to debate -- shut down rational debate by accusing the other side of incvility or toxicity, the moment they say something that rubs you the wrong way. It's a blatant _ad hominem_ attack.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.