Unpopular Opinion: Bitcoin is simple. I could have written it, but I didn't because I was looking in the wrong place. A lot of people could have written it, and source material was public (cryptography mailing list). The author of bitcoin is just like the rest of us. Not a genius
-
-
Replying to @BobMcElrath
I would argue it takes a considerable thought power to glue them all together to finally come up with Bitcoin. It's extraordinarily simple in retrospect. But getting almost everything at place in the very begining is a different thing.
3 replies 0 retweets 87 likes -
Replying to @RajarshiMaitra @BobMcElrath
Agree. Weren't there other brilliant people working on the same exact problem for several years (even decades?) before Satoshi came up with bitcoin? Like
@adam3us and@NickSzabo4 ? OT seems like a troll-tweet....3 replies 1 retweet 33 likes -
Replying to @serumroth @RajarshiMaitra and
There is tons of bizarre fantasy in the OT, but one of the things wrong with it is that a non-official & decentralized currency was politically & economically a very fringe idea. All economists of all stripes, including Austrian, who heard the idea either ignored or rejected it.
4 replies 24 retweets 154 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @serumroth and
It also required advanced computer science that flew in the face of traditional proofs that said essentially that trust-minimizing a decentralized application was impossible. The vast majority of laypeople and even some computer scientists rejected these ideas on such grounds.
3 replies 13 retweets 148 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @serumroth and
The intersection of people who knew the proofs applied only to absolute, not astronomically probable, consensus & people who believed in very unusual economic & political ideas was minutely small. We were on the internet when it was far smaller than today & could find each other.
8 replies 8 retweets 138 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @serumroth and
I wonder when and if another similar era of like-minded folks finding each other would or could happen again. The amount of noise and political posturing makes me think it won't happen for a while, if ever again.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TonySakich @serumroth and
There is quite a bit more haystack to go through to search for the needles, alas.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @serumroth and
Not to mention the level of expertise needed to access communities in that era automatically brought people together who shared technical ability & curiosity to make it happen. I've learned far more studying old USENET posts & mailing lists than anything on modern social media.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TonySakich @NickSzabo4 and
sincere question: do you guys think bitcoin is still "untamed" -- i.e. hasn't been co-opted / brought under the mighty thumb? I've been putting my faith in the "no hard fork" principle. But why has there not been a lot more state resistance?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Yes it is still untamed, because they have many more easier targets to go after (Libra, for example).
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @TonySakich and
hmm. Libra seems cut from the legacy cloth to begin with. [centralized, supported by legacy institutions, tame] Are 'they' really treating it as a threat? Just for show, maybe.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.