It doesn't cost any more to store bits or paper in Europe now than it did when interest rates were positive. The "storage costs" metaphor as a justification for negative interest rates is a whopping falsehood.
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4
Bloomberg's blithely asserting the "non-weirdness" of something that has not happened in 5,000 years is a pretty unique take:https://www.businessinsider.com/5000-year-history-of-interest-rates-2016-12 …
1 reply 10 retweets 44 likes -
Replying to @BradCLemley @NickSzabo4
Reading on negative yields, it's easy to distinguish the real jurnos from the jackals trying to benefit from robbing the orphans & widows. The real jurnos will mention the coercion against pension funds, etc.; whereas the jackals will try to convince that negative yields are OK.
1 reply 2 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @gluckq2 @NickSzabo4
Yes, okay for the big boys who do cross-currency basis swaps, but murderous for, say, pension funds with rules forcing them into these instruments. Negative rates exploit "rule inertia" - the fact that rule makers never imagined such rates would exist.
1 reply 3 retweets 13 likes
They also expose how heavily and disastrously regulated the fixed-income market is. It often departs very far from the ideal free market of economics classrooms, with prices often "signalling" more the consequences of regulations than natural supply and demand.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.