I don't understand how flight to foreign assets is a threat to your proposed policy but capital flight to gold or BTC isn't.
-
-
Replying to @xcsler @NickSzabo4 and
Flight to foreign assets *isn't* a threat to our policy. Neither is flight to gold or BTC.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mileskimball @xcsler and
No asset that can fluctuate in its nominal price is a threat to our policy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mileskimball @xcsler and
Only problem is when prices are set in something that inherently has a 0 rate of ROR in terms of itself. Currently, paper currency is somewhat like that, but that can be fixed. If prices were set in something else that inherently had a 0 return in terms of itself that's a problem
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mileskimball @NickSzabo4 and
So you'd have to prevent people from using crypto and gold as media of exchange?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @xcsler @NickSzabo4 and
It is totally fine for people to use crypto and gold as media of exchange. I have myself proposed the reintroduction of gold coins minted by the government. What is a problem is if people use gold or crypto as a unit of account. The dollar needs to remain the unit of account.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mileskimball @xcsler and
Here is where I propose the reintroduction of gold and silver coins minted by the government:https://blog.supplysideliberal.com/post/112762204734/qa-is-electronic-money-the-mark-of-the-beast …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mileskimball @xcsler and
Hi Miles, great thread! Could you please elaborate why it is a problem if people use gold or bitcoin as unit if account? Why should USD stay unit of account? USD always has the problem of the Triffin Dilemma.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @100trillionUSD @xcsler and
It is simply this: In order for monetary stabilization to be possible, the central bank needs to be in charge of the unit of account—or at least a unit in which *many* prices are set. The Bitcoin software is not sophisticated enough to do stabilizing monetary policy.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mileskimball @100trillionUSD and
"The Bitcoin software is not sophisticated enough to do stabilizing monetary policy." What exactly is it lacking? What is a "stabilizing monetary policy" other than "prone to manipulation via interest rates and money printing"?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
it's Cantillon insiders creating money out of thin air for each other, and hiring macroeconomic astrologers to justify it through the splendid pseudoscience of saving our economy from disaster.
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @gitbtc and
Nick Szabo 🔑 Retweeted Nick Szabo 🔑
Nick Szabo 🔑 added,
Nick Szabo 🔑 @NickSzabo4The Cantillon effect: "the first ones to receive the newly created money see their incomes rise, whereas the last ones to receive the newly created money see their purchasing power decline as consumer price inflation comes about." https://mises.org/library/how-central-banking-increased-inequality … https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Cantillon …0 replies 1 retweet 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @gitbtc and
It's incredible how otherwise intelligent people like
@mileskimball can't think 2 steps ahead and realize the inordinate amount of oppression they would have to enact on others to enable their well-intentioned monetary policies.0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.