When good engineers design or discuss a smart contract, they talk specifics & closely follow the money. Talking in euphemisms leads to security holes. Human institutions are far more subjective. Nevertheless, ...https://twitter.com/NickSzabo4/status/1152957111837478913 …
-
Show this thread
-
... people writing traditional contracts, bylaws, charters, constitutions, statutes, access controls, procedures, or other such "wet code", or discussing same, should learn lessons from engineers. More rigor and specifics. Explicitly follow the money. Far less euphemism please!
3 replies 10 retweets 80 likesShow this thread -
P.S. the legal profession has centuries of experience. Smart contract engineers can also improve their art by studying what lawyers have learned over the centuries. Study contract law and legal drafting, including historical examples from simpler times. https://nakamotoinstitute.org/contract-language/ …
7 replies 28 retweets 102 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
My legal eagle buddies all approached me about bitcoin and smart contract coins, nothing else. You’re right on the money with this. Nick, was Satoshi directly referring to smart contracts here ? - would love your thoughts - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=750.msg8140#msg8140 …
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
I looks like it to me, although that particular comment is a bit short on specifics.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.