Fighting over the planet's thermostat will lead to wars. Multiply a common household quarrel by seven billion. Since fossil fuels are still by far the most effective way to power weapons (nukes aside), those wars will be won by the side that emits the most carbon.https://twitter.com/zerohedge/status/1145383087225954305 …
-
Except that there may be no winner in your scenario, which is the whole point here.
-
-
If we are all dead, who is the winner, relatively?
-
nature?
-
Not sure nature is interested in winning wars. We are part of nature - but we may be the only ones that care. Time to move beyond thinking in terms of wars that can be won.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.