Gold has severe flaws. Physical locality makes it less secure and far more transactionally local, and thus more vulnerable to politics and less sound, than we can now achieve with Bitcoin, with good key management and taking advantage of its trust-minimized global settlement.https://twitter.com/MrHodl/status/991676293052813312 …
-
-
Bank notes further increased trust, i.e. vulnerability. to the actions of third parties. Gold came to be held in centralized vaults, and IOUs for much more than the gold actually held were issued -- fractional reserve banking (FRB).https://twitter.com/bitstein/status/1145438009636085760 …
Show this thread -
Governments helped set up the largest banks, which printed even more bank notes and used them to buy government debt. These banks became (Bank of England) or were set up as (Federal Reserve) note-issuing monopolies, which we now call central banks.
Show this thread -
Eventually default turned these gold IOU paper notes into fiat. BofE started refusing to honor its notes in 1931. The Fed reduced the amount of gold it would redeem a dollar for in 1933, restricted gold trade by targeting the centralized bank vaults, and went full fiat in 1971.
Show this thread -
Here's an example showing how, despite authority resemblance https://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2016/07/artifacts-of-wealth-patterns-in_15.html … the fundamental nature of U.S. dollars radically changed over the course of the 20th century. They look very similar, but the kind of money they represent is radically different. ht
@jp_koningpic.twitter.com/JF7KifIcXJ
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Still harder to counterfeit and pass, and easier for retailers to detect counterfeits, than for coins.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Have you considered the possibility that gold’s price elasticity of supply is a *must have* feature that makes gold sound money? Conversely, bitcoin’s perfectly inelastic supply (there can ever be 21m) makes it terrible as money due to lack of stabilization mechanismspic.twitter.com/VBqKrXOl7e
-
This ignores why the business cycle happens in the first place, which is due to artificially low interest rates. Elastic supply isn’t necessary, and you wouldn’t even need to consider it if bankers didn’t (or couldn’t) lend fractional reserves in the first place.
-
“Business cycles happens due to artificially low interest rates” <- I was going to ignore this hilariously naive comment but it attracted a like from Nick Szabo himself
. Best of luck with your “store of value” project guys. -
Nobel Prize-winning economic theories are naive? https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1974/press-release/ … I’m impressed with your chutzpah. I’d have a hard time gathering the courage to call Mises and Hayek naive!
-
Did Hayek ever say business cycles began happening *only* after the invention of fractional reserve banking? If so, I guess this’d be the first time a Nobel winning economist is wrong
-
Fractional reserve banking is a much older scam than 1913. Read a history book.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
spot platinum currently ~40% cheaper!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
yes golds greatest flaw is that it requires the holder to be in safe stable country to enjoy their holdings. Gold holdings would not survive a despotic regime or a confiscatory one.
-
ask a gold bug how they plan to move 100k or even 100million of gold across the border
-
They'll tokenise 'em
#gold. No need transporting... -
Token holders have to trust whoever is storing their gold.
-
Yes, but the gold storage trust talking point is all secondary, when the transaction has been settled in
#tokens. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.