That's economics' second-biggest flaw. Its biggest flaw is its habit of assuming away coercion (in politics, foreign affairs and trade, immigration, law, crime, etc.) and security and yet pretending that its results are universal or readily applicable in coercive situations.https://twitter.com/EconTalker/status/1098641809608269824 …
-
-
-
Replying to @EconTalker
Most political issues provide examples but here is one where everybody thinks economics should dominate thinking: foreign trade. Economists count the foreign revenues as benefit, even when those revenues are being used to build nuclear missiles aimed at the trading partner.
4 replies 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @EconTalker
If you think an economic model is failing to explain reality, it can be improved. That's part of economics too. And btw economics deals (or can deal) with what you are talking about - e.g.: externalities.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, economists deal with tons of important issues by wrapping them in the hopelessly abstract label "externalities" and then, their brains softly lulled by this opaque packaging, proceed to forget about them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.