Ofc 1 BTC = 1 BTC alone doesn’t make for sound money. The point economists miss is that #Bitcoin is like a ruler. Finite supply allows us to measure other things. Fiat supply keeps growing, so measuring in $’s is meaningless. Can’t measure things with a ruler that keeps changing.https://twitter.com/lawrencehwhite1/status/1099427956131287040 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Excellion
This doesn't account for variation in demand, which is what produces Bitcoin's volatility. It will very likely decline, eventually even below the volatility of fiat, but it will never be zero. There is no such thing as a ruler in economics, and can't be.
15 replies 17 retweets 145 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @Excellion
"There *is* such a thing as a ruler in economics, and the thing that measures is time" --You, basically. cc
@ScandalOfMoneypic.twitter.com/jTRUm1a7bv
2 replies 2 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @eiaine @NickSzabo4 and
Funny enough it’s not just Bitcoin, distance (i.e. actual rulers) are based off time as well: The metre is defined as the length of the path travelled by light in a vacuum in 1/299 792 458 second
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @jeetsidhu_ @NickSzabo4 and
wait, why did'nt they pick a round number like 3.00e-8?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @eiaine @NickSzabo4 and
They had a better “ruler” in lasers to measure but they needed to take into account the margin of error in the old less dependable ruler to maintain backwards compatibility https://www.bipm.org/en/CGPM/db/17/1/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @jeetsidhu_ @NickSzabo4 and
so c=3.00e8 until 1983? man, they should have just made the meter slightly shorter. given the manufacturing tolerances back then, no one would have noticed.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Soon after 1800 machinists using McCauley's micrometer could measure distances down to 3 millionths of a meter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Maudslay#Micrometer …
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @eiaine and
We finally are switching kilograms; To now be defined by a property of the universe/universal constant.https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/redefine-kilogram-180970798/ …
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.