It depends if the subset is representative for the whole network.
-
-
Replying to @CarstenBKK @brian_trollz and
Hard to tell without having access to the raw data.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CarstenBKK @TanukiBTC and
No, it's _impossible_ to tell with that data alone.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable
-
You're trying to draw conclusions from data that is literally incapable of informing the whole picture.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @brian_trollz @TanukiBTC and
It's far better than the data you have presented here, unless I missed it.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @TanukiBTC and
Unless you're saying Luke is intentionally misrepresenting things, he has put forward data. Just not the means with which it was gathered.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @brian_trollz @TanukiBTC and
I was talking about your tweets not Luke's, but now that you mention it do you have a link to Luke's data?
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @TanukiBTC and
He has seen a drop from ~100k nodes to around ~55k over the last year. Lemme search for a link, or see if
@LukeDashjr can affirm this himself here.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @brian_trollz @NickSzabo4 and
Here's his current count feed, I don't think it directly displays historical trends, but I was actively watching this during last year and saw the count at ~100k: https://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Thanks! Would love to get independent confirmation(s), since this trend is oddly opposite that of the reachable nodes.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.