No hodlonaut, you are distorting "facts." That graph is of _publicly reachable nodes_. Not all full nodes are publicly reachable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Unless you're saying Luke is intentionally misrepresenting things, he has put forward data. Just not the means with which it was gathered.
I was talking about your tweets not Luke's, but now that you mention it do you have a link to Luke's data?
-
-
He has seen a drop from ~100k nodes to around ~55k over the last year. Lemme search for a link, or see if
@LukeDashjr can affirm this himself here. -
Here's his current count feed, I don't think it directly displays historical trends, but I was actively watching this during last year and saw the count at ~100k: https://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/charts/software.html …
-
Thanks! Would love to get independent confirmation(s), since this trend is oddly opposite that of the reachable nodes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
My main concern isn't even about the data, I am not even convinced if the decreasing node count is just correlated with the growing blockchain size or if it's caused by the growing blockchain. There might be other dominant factors preventing users from running nodes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.