It strikes me from watching this incident that there’s no shared definition of ‘cryptocurrency’
-
-
Replying to @Ruminorang
It's another word or phrase in this business that many a dishonest huckster feels that it's perfectly OK to re-apply to their own very inferior thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @DZack23 @NickSzabo4
It’s somewhat understandable to me that it’s not so obvious. It took me awhile to understand how bitcoin works, what with learning what a hash function is and how Eilliptical Curve math works... only to find out those bits aren’t even the central innovation of bitcoin
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But then bitcoin isn’t the first cryptocurrency
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ruminorang @DZack23
Why not? It was the first thing that was called a cryptocurrency, and it was radically different, including wrt said trust minimization, than any implemented protocol that had preceded it.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @DZack23
Well it would be much simpler in my mind if we did say bitcoin is the first cryptocurrency. So, I’d be for that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I thought it’s predecessors were also referred to by that term?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
That’s just my ignorance on the history
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It’s a bit confusing because the cryptography is needed for the key generation and data structure but has nothing to do with the central innovation of PoW. Almost seems like PoW-currency would be a better term to differentiate
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
True enough. Also people in the cryptography biz are pissed that "crypto" now more often refers to "cryptocurrency" than to "cryptography".
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.