This is silly socialist sophistry. Words means things, and socialism specifically means gov't ownership of capital which necessitates authoritarian control of people's economic decisions, which inevitably degenerates into mass violence. Rothbard explains:https://mises.org/library/end-socialism-and-calculation-debate-revisited …
-
The legal definition of ownership: whey a government owns something, they own it, not anybody else.
In particular, governments usually have a very small number of particular officials who are legally authorized to make decisions regarding the disposal or use of government property their department controls, within usually wide constraints of abstract laws and executive orders.
![Hodl Vision ⚡️🔑 [BTC]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1153323081898876933/bbZYi3UL_normal.jpg)
-
-
To call this being "controlled by the community" is a malicious double lie -- the electorate of a typical state does not form a community of people who talk to each other peer-to-peer, and the actual legal control is in the hands of only an extremely small number of officials.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
We've never had perfect free markets and never had perfect communism. But we've come close. The freest markets we've had are places like Switzerland and Hong Kong. The most communist places like Cambodia & North Korea. Look and compare!
-
Tweet unavailable
-
There's no such thing as a community of a million.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
All of these, when the are actual communities, have far less than a million people.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
As a trust-based asset that's not so tempting, but that is a good example of how government-owned property works, thanks.
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.