Nope some are more equal than others. Green New Deal leaders get to fly airplanes around the world, because they are saving the planet, but you will have to pay through the nose to deliver goods in your truck, because you are a polluting NPC.https://twitter.com/tpavlik/status/1093650410437406720 …
-
-
Replying to @NickSzabo4
That's like saying the president is a fraud because he gets a free house from the government but you have to buy/rent one. Nonetheless we will have electric planes soon. I'm glad to hear you kinda agree we have a pollution issue, that's an improvement for republicans
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pupper_rare
Oh great another strategy game trope, sci-fi technology. Our economy doesn't need tech that actually works, we only need to simulate it and people can "fly" wherever they like.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
Quite easy to be negative, there is always a million reasons why not to do something. However, we know we have a problem which you seem to acknowledge, can you or anyone in your political party give us a solution that is based on science, not 'pray for it' ? eyes on the prize.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pupper_rare
Some problems are unsolvable, so lack of a solution is hardly a good argument for an extremely destructive non-solution such as the Green New Deal. Any sane solution would have to start with the countries that will dominate future greenhouse gas emissions, India and China.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
But we're not going after those countries and focusing on this issue bcuz our leadership lacks 7th grade understand of science and confuses climate vs. weather. Given the toolset we have, the Green New Deal is the best solution we currently have, standing idle isn't gonna cut it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pupper_rare
Destroying careers people have been learning for & working at for decades, forcing them to damage the health of their children, greatly increasing the costs of doing myriads of basic things such as driving the kids and delivering goods, certainly won't cut it. Ask Macron.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4
When the alternative is 1000x worse than any temporary side effect you describe, I suspect we don't have a common goal here which is leaving this planet in a better shape for our children. "Evil prevails when good men do nothing". Was good chatting, I love your Bitcoin material
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pupper_rare
Warmer air, lusher greenery, more crops and weeds, and flooded beaches are 1000x worse than destroyed jobs, damaged health, and re-igniting the old epidemic of poverty? You are quite the pathological whack job. Blocked.
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @pupper_rare
Global warming will be dealt in future as the most enduring case of mass hysteria. It's unbelievable that people can't read graphics nor estimate risk.pic.twitter.com/bTzjw3zpkX
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Your graphs hide how quickly it is happening or probably could hapen, that is the main legitimate concern.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.