You omitted the qualifying statement (from the article): “Although the sentence seems awkwardly worded when considered alone, its meaning in the context of discussing the creation of jobs through the pioneering of new, environmentally-friendly technologies was reasonably clear.”
Great @AOC when you invent this technology get back to us. Until that time STFU for God's sake.
-
-
-
It's still stupid. Silicon Valley went through this "clean energy" fad a few years ago and end up losing huge amounts of money and luring people into dead-end jobs.
-
Having failed in the market, these greens now want to force their delusional sci-fi on us via political thuggery.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think it's important for people like her to rise to popularity. Her extreme and bad ideas provide a more obvious contrast for better ideas that might otherwise go unnoticed.
-
Alas, most people are way too ignorant of history, economics, and engineering to realize how bad they are.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How can such rampant ignorance be elected to lead?
#AOC -
Voters don't have time to learn about who they are voting for, and don't have incentive to learn because the consequences are widely distributed.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She is not wrong. Her job as a politician is in part to direct people towards worthy endeavors. Inventing technology that has already been invented is not one of them.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.