20/ “Collectibles augmented our large brains and language as solutions to the Prisoner's Dilemma that keeps almost all animals from cooperating via delayed reciprocation with non-kin.” -- @NickSzabo4
-
Show this thread
-
21/ With their unprecedented technology of cooperation, humans had become the most fearsome predator ever seen on the planet. They adapted to a shifting climate, while Neanderthals and dozens of their large herd prey were driven to extinction (through hunting and climate change).
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
22/ Fun fact: Most large animals on the planet today are afraid of projectiles – an adaption to only one species of predator (humans).
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
23/ Homo Sapiens built better social institutions (wealth transfer via collectables, language, marriage, inheritance). This lead to the displacement of the stronger Neanderthals. Sapiens increased carrying capacity by 10x & had time for art (cave paintings, figurines, jewelry)
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
24/ In summary: “The results for our ancient forebears were the first secure forms of embodied value very different from concrete utility – forerunner of today's money” In other words: Our ancestor’s invented “monetary premium” which has persisted from shells to Bitcoin.
2 replies 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
Brandon Quittem Retweeted Brandon Quittem
PS: If you enjoyed this, I did a similar thread summarizing
@aantonop book “Internet of Money: Volume 2"
https://twitter.com/bquittem/status/979650054934822912 …Brandon Quittem added,
3 replies 1 retweet 14 likesShow this thread -
Here I briefly explain my position. The collectible narrative, like Mises Regression Theorem, is completely unnecessary.
@NickSzabo4https://link.medium.com/10NdLfpCPT2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Indeed I've also found 'intrinsic value'/'backstop' theories silly. It's like arguing that an insurance contract can't be valuable unless it can be converted to something concrete or that it has to be something solid like a building before it can turn into insurance.
2 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Regarding the issue, what I find a very worrying problem is requiring value before utility, the underlying reason of that requirement is the confusion between money and credit. Austrians (Miseans) fail to acknowledge that fiat is credit.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Fiat isn't even credit. Many decades ago its precursor, the gold bank note, was credit but was reneged on, and out of habit and network effects people keep using the never-to-be-repaid IOUs as money.
2 replies 2 retweets 4 likes
Granted, its supply grows and shrinks (mostly the forrmer) by the issuance of fractionally collateralized credit.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.