You have plenty of them yourself, did you not?
-
-
-
Replying to @VitalikButerin @NickSzabo4
I won't let you answer principles of crypto law questions with politics or governance outcomes questions. We want different things and we don't have an exhaustive list of the disputes that might get into in the future. We need to focus on the process and operation of crypto law!
3 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @VladZamfir @NickSzabo4
But principles depend on broad generalizations of what kinds of outcomes we like!
2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @VitalikButerin @NickSzabo4
Yes, but that's the easy part. How do we govern in the case of disputes?
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @VladZamfir @NickSzabo4
One possible answer is: choose the side that does not alter blockchains for non technical reasons. Whether you accept or reject that depends on your outcome preferences.
2 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
What about trying more explicitly to facilitate competing opt-in, consent-based dispute resolution processes?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Sorry, but we need to deal with public law, not just private law
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think I understand the distinction you’re trying to make but not sure I agree. Is stuck funds an example of a “public law” dispute you are targeting?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PatBerarducci @VladZamfir and
Or are you referring to dealing with “public law” vis-a-vis actual nation-states, Eg, USA, EU?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
"The law" 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.