Against @NickSzabo4's Law, For A New Crypto Legal System
I am willing to die on this hill.https://link.medium.com/NvXjbhJIMT
-
-
@NickSzabo4 are you surprised bitcoin is basically still legal? - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm strongly reminded of Van Dun's "Against Libertarian Legalism", which is a call for humility. It appears that Zamfir is walking in the same trap, by preaching "Crypto Legalism". https://mises.org/library/against-libertarian-legalism-comment-kinsella-and-block-0 …pic.twitter.com/RWi7XwTU3n
-
We already have Nick's crappy, insecure and aggressive crypto legalism. I would rather just have less legalism than to have this crypto law.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Indeed,only one principle is of utmost structural importance nowwww..self-Sovereign human authority,technical perma-structure w/ Constitutional guarantee & protection..
#WePeople expressed as I & I in all lawful transactions. Origin of socio-economic existence at play, in war..Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not especially clear to me who (in this comment) is trying/pretending to reinvent this from scratch. Who are you referring to?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Legal systems generate the rules governing an economic system for the purpose of making the pair sustainably stronger. "Settling disputes" is way too narrow. Law defines, detects, & corrects non-optimal economic events such as cancer.
-
Agreed generally, tho not sure about the cancer example; I would say that if you zoom out enough, a legal definition of what constitutes cancer, say, actually does ultimately exist to settle disputes (do you have something else in mind?)
-
My objection to restricting it to "settling disputes" is that it does not explicitly include defining & detecting them. It also implies specific parties which does not clearly include prevention of systemic non-optimal conditions such as monopolies, pollution, & lack of roads.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
-
Very Blackstoneian
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, if “crypto law” comes in conflict with the legal system and I feel the legal system is unjust I’d rather use guns to defend against the legal system than try and bend crypto law to be more aligned. I’m willing to die on this hill (Or in a SWAT raid).
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Looks like even those who invented something innovative loose faith once in a while
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Vitalik Rekterin
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
From the same place as "he who governs least governs the best"? (That's TJ, as I'm sure you know)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These dispute resolution protocols are what have kept our civilization, well, civil (at least more than it otherwise would have been). Some changes to these will occur as a result of societal developments, but IMO it won't be fast. Probably better to be quite deliberative here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
History has proven again and again that any ever lasting social constructs doesn’t allow predictions for the upcoming 5 years ;) “Young people believe in change, old people in stability”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.