-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He doesn't understand the computer science, and thus makes many misleading claims and suggests things aren't solvable when they are.
-
I think it is worse, he doesn't understand economics. If you look at the real skin in the game published costs of building a new large mining facility vs output it would cost >$100B to reach 50% of network hash rate in new facility costs and it would be very public.
-
Maybe a mining pool hack across multiple pools could achieve >50% and be possible but it would be noticed very quickly probably 1 block max.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Hi Nick, do you think Bitcoin network will be successfully 51% attacked ?
-
A 51% attack requires owning Bitcoin in order to destroy it, which presumes some very peculiar incentives. ...
-
Thanks, but technically, it’s quite possible right? If someone has enough capital
-
Like the Federal Reserve? Or Goldman Sachs?
-
... The occult Bitcoin backstory becomes important at this point. (Might some Fiat-Communism Plutocrat preparing a 51% attack expect an uncomfortable visit from the NSA?)
-
... Still, depending on the support of a scary spook uncle would count as the index of a (very high-level) security hole, admittedly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Eclipse attack - For practical avoidance you want 5 nodes: two public & three private, coordinated with other publics. If all nodes become semi-public, but are not relied upon for syncing, systems grow vulnerable. If networks avoided node sharing, this would increase cost?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Have you seen this fella’s paper?https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2019/01/bitcoin-much-less-secure-people-think.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hashgraph claims that eventually consistent consensus can be maintained with only one (not necessarily constant) bridge across an otherwise bipartite division of honest actors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashgraph
-
This is not to diminish the importance of global broadcast, rather to cite a non-globally broadcast, allegedly provable secure consensus system.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
True and a company that could be the mediator (just in case)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.