Bitcoin suicide: ask investors to create an artificial run on crypto exchanges-an uncontrolled stress test in a new & fragile market. Exchanges create needed on-ramps for non-techs & reg certainty. @ToneVays @LeahWald @coinbase @krakenfx @saifedean @NickSzabo4 @CaitlinLong_https://twitter.com/ToneVays/status/1074695740826497024 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @lyrichues @LeahWald and
If you're right, I would love to pick up a shit ton of
#Bitcoin in the Bloodbath of incompetence6 replies 1 retweet 39 likes -
You have an iron stomach for trading and a long term view. But this will spook institutional and retail investors, big time. Community should rethink this stunt.
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @lyrichues @LeahWald and
I hope so, my biggest fear is everyone getting comfortable with a giant amount if
#Bitcoin held in regulated entities at risk of US Govn't confiscation with a phone call like with#Gold in 1933.3 replies 1 retweet 36 likes -
I totally understand that but is that the biggest threat to crypto assets right now? I think it is probably adoption and education.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @lyrichues @ToneVays and
Adoption and education are inevitable. Anti-fragility is not, it must evolve in a hostile env. Also, I think this stunt is more likely to bring needed awareness to the need to control ones own keys than to damage major exchanges. Unless I'm wrong, then see my first point.
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @jimyoung2817 @ToneVays and
Nothing is inevitable with crypto. This will just confuse people who don't think they're technically capable or physically secure holding their own keys. Exchanges are a bridge for them. Blow them up, or threaten to, and they will go away. Default behavior matters.
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @lyrichues @jimyoung2817 and
Indeed t does matter. A default that trusts a third party deprives users of most of the main benefits of a cryptocurrency & gives risky influence to centralizers who do not or care not to appreciate these benefits, but want a PayPal controlled by themselves instead of by PayPal.
3 replies 3 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @NickSzabo4 @jimyoung2817 and
Imagine that the exchanges are like banks. If you suddenly had depositors withdraw all of their money they wouldn't be able to deliver. That doesn't mean they are or are not sound. What is being proposed is essentially a bank run. It will be seen as reckless & self-destructive.
5 replies 1 retweet 1 like
If digitally centralized banks are the way you want to do business please stick with the banks and leave trust-minimized money to the people who actually need and appreciate it.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
) latest on
